BRIG. GEN. PATRICK FINNEGAN KNOWS 36 JUDGES LIED.

Double left-click on any document twice to enlarge it for easy viewing. To return to reading this blog, click once on your Internet browser's " Back " button.

WONDER WHAT THE PENTAGON WILL SAY?

Time-line for Stacy Dix-K.


Monday, 9/22/2008-Lt. Col. Kevin Reilly at Fort Knox.


Tuesday, 9/23/2008- change of plan, exchanged hand-written notes with the Pentagon.


Wednesday, 9/24/2008- Back to Jersey City, talked with investigator at the Pentagon. He was fine with me, told me: post everything on the Internet, Anthrax screening of hard-copies takes months.

Ususally my hard-copies get thrown away. Examples (1) Congressman Mica's office sent a FedX to the House Judiciary Committee that was deemed "lost". It wasn't lost. It was deliberately thrown away. (2) My meeting request letter to President Bollinger was not "lost" either. It was thrown away, a second request is in play, (3) My loan servicing company threw away my file 13 times---everytime, I replaced it---it was a running joke. The modus operandi of the criminals that I am dealing with is that they create a false record, and then, they base more crimes on that false record.


Thursday, 9/25/2008-

4:30 pm to 5 pm- I won against the landlords in Superior Court.


9:30 pm-police and Jersey City Medical Center came to my house. Who sent you? Dr. Chang. Why? They refused to say.

[ I discovered later that a fax, sent about 6 pm was sent from municipal court to Jersey City Medical Center. Municipal court is in a different geographic location than Superior Court. I had no contact with municipal court since 9/12/2008 ]


Friday, 9/26/2008- I went to Jersey City Medical Center, personally, brought a witness with me. I talked to Dr. Chang, on the phone at the front desk, what’s going on Dr. Chang? Why are you sending people to my house?

All Doctor Chang said was: “I can’t talk to you, I can’t talk to you”

Now, if I was a terrorist with a bomb, shouldn’t Dr. Chang, a psychiatrist, have talked to me then? NOT DAYS LATER.

[ phone calls to Stacy Dix-K. She refused to return them ]


Monday, September 29, 2008

Tuesday, September 30, 2008- Another attack.

10 am-check- up with neurologist.

4 pm- supposed to pick-up witness statement. Instead, 4 pm panic phone call from family, come home, big crisis. There was no big crisis. Jersey City Medical Center lied to my family to scare them.

What is going on? I made phone calls to clerk of court, sheriff, landlords’ attorneys. Got a run-around.

Dr. Chang refused to talk to me, on Friday, 9/26/2008. If I was a terrorist threatening to blow up a school with a bomb, shouldn’t he have talked to me then?

The rest was engineered to get me into a locked psychiatric ward, falsify a record, in another attempt to discredit me, because the big picture is: “the goy can’t win” campaign, I must be made an example of, I must be crucified, ground under the boot, so no one else in a totalitarian society questions authority.

[perhaps the true power of the Internet is that victims of totalitarian socities can post evidence on the Internet]

All the lies Dr. Stewart told……list A.

All the lies Dr. Jelnov told……list B.

All the lies the police told…….list C.

Please, I'm going to Plan B.


Really, Stacy, a hearing in front of a judge in 10 days----which judge?
I have 36 crooks, in the Second Circuit alone, really Stacy, my professors in medical school were consutled? which professors?

MY PROFESSORS IN MEDICAL SCHOOL ARE LYING TO STEAL MONEY FROM ME, what do you think they are going to say, my DEAN already admitted to falsifying a security report to the Board of Trustees.

Michael J. Reichgott, MD, my "former" dean of students already admitted that he FALSIFIED a security report to illegally break into my home on the Einstein campus. The Board of Trustees already admitted this was true, but claimed it wasn't important, because it was only one example. I have more examples.

The criminals that I am dealing with operate this way, first, they falsify a record [reports], then, they base more crimes on that false record, amply demonstrated in my case, alone.

On 9/12/2008, I showed Stacy the post-marked envelopes and bills that my loan servicing company sent me [ Dan Riesel, a "former" chief prosecutor, falsely accused me of forging a promissory note that I discovered in June 2005, this is new evidence that I discovered after a May 2005 ruling against me, giving me the ability to submit an amended complaint, I did not "forge" this promissory note, as the post-marked envelopes and bills demonstate] did she do a mental health evaluation of the CRIMINALS associated with my medical school that are lying to steal from me, shut me up and ruin my life? No. She only did a mental health evaluation of her innocent victim.

Did Stacy and Dr. Chang do this before? How many others did she mis-diagnose?

Dr. David, from my medical school, saved a woman who was misdiagnosed, she didn't have a "thought disorder" [ schizophrenia ]; he's famous for it.

Of course, the little problem that Dr. David has regarding his creditability is that he made false statements of material fact regarding my eligibility to borrow, my status, [ words dishonest attorneys put in his mouth ], false statements that he could correct at any time, EVEN NOW. What's stopping you from telling the truth now, Dr. David? The defense of entrapment is not available, because that defense only applies if the target had no other choice.

I think Dr. David may have been used as an expert witness in a murder trial. The man that is serving time now, is he innocent? did anyone tell him or his lawyer?

HOWARD DEAN-leader, National Democratic Party

Unsolicited Ken and Pat took pictures so that I would not be accused by dishonest doctors, like Dr. Jelnov at Jersey

City Medical Center, of being delusional.

Thank you, Ken and Pat.

***Double-click on any document or photo to enlarge it, for ease of viewing;to return to reading this blog, simply click once on your Internet browser's " Back" button.

Ken and Pat are normal, decent people who understood that they were witnessing gross Human Rights Abuses in the United States in my case, and, unsolicited, took photographs to protect me from Dr. Jelnov, a sadist and a sociopath. Thank you, again, Ken and Pat.

Dr. Jelnov is a dishonest psychiatrist at Jersey City Medical Center who threatened me. Dr. Jelnov told me that if I did let Jews from my medical school, aided and abetted by 36 federal judges, 36 crooks, steal money from me, then, he would lie about me even more with the goal of placing me in a locked psychiatric ward for the rest of my life, even though everyone knows that I do not have a mental disease or mental defect, and can easily prove that Dr. Jelnov's diagnosis that I have been continuously out-of-contact with reality for the past 20 years is so utterly unbelievable that it calls into question Dr. Jelnov's grip on reality.

In sum, Dr. Jelnov threatened me with life in prison without parole, with the threat of having drugs injected into my body by force, because I defended myself against Jewish criminals, and their accomplices.

Is Dr. Jelnov from Russia? I can't wait to see his resume in the upcoming criminal trial. Dr. Jelnov is a danger to society.

In Russia, Psychiatry Is Again a Tool Against Dissent

By Peter FinnWashington Post Foreign ServiceSaturday, September 30, 2006; A01

DUBNA, Russia -- On March 23, police and emergency medical personnel stormed Marina Trutko's home, breaking down her apartment door and quickly subduing her with an injection of haloperidol, a powerful tranquilizer. One policeman put her 78-year-old mother, Valentina, in a storage closet while Trutko, 42, was carried out to a waiting ambulance. It took her to the nearby Psychiatric Hospital No. 14.

The former nuclear scientist, a vocal activist and public defender for several years in this city 70 miles north of Moscow, spent the next six weeks undergoing a daily regimen of injections and drugs to treat what was diagnosed as a "paranoid personality disorder."

"She is also very rude," psychiatrists noted in her case file.

In person, Trutko presents a different profile, reserved and formal as she recounts her legal and psychiatric ordeal and invokes the minutiae of Russian law without having to refer to texts. An independent evaluation found that although she did not have an "ordinary personality," she was "very gifted and creative" and displayed no psychiatric symptoms.

Trutko is new evidence that Soviet-style forced psychiatry has reemerged in Russia as a weapon to intimidate or discredit citizens who tangle with the authorities, according to human rights activists and some mental health professionals. Despite major reforms in the early 1990s, some officials are again employing this form of repression.

"Abuse has begun to creep back in, and we're seeing more cases," said Lyubov Vinogradova, executive director of the Independent Psychiatric Association of Russia, an advocacy group. "It's not on a mass scale like in Soviet times, but it's worrying."

In those years, tens of thousands of dissidents were wrongfully subjected to forced hospitalization, sometimes for years, based on trumped-up diagnoses of "schizophrenia."

Dissidents were said to exhibit inflexibility of convictions and nervous exhaustion brought on by anti-government activities. "Reformist delusions," the Soviets called it. If you were against communism, in other words, you were insane.

Some of the new cases have been abetted by institutions or doctors involved in it in the Soviet period. Trutko, who is originally from Uzbekistan, was diagnosed at the Serbsky Institute for Social and Forensic Psychiatry in Moscow, one of the most infamous of the Soviet institutions that imprisoned dissidents. It remains a secretive institution that has never faced up to its repressive past, according to human rights groups.

As recently as 2001, the institute's director, Tatyana Dmitriyeva, denied that the Soviet Union engaged in any more psychiatric abuse than Western countries, according to the report "Human Rights and Psychiatry in the Russian Federation" by the Moscow Helsinki Group.

One of signatures on Trutko's official evaluation, which declared she had paranoid personality disorder, is that of Yakob Landau, a longtime Serbsky psychiatrist who headed the institute's notorious Unit No. 4 during Soviet days.

Officials at the institute, a walled and forbidding complex in central Moscow, said no one was available to comment for this article. Investigators in Trutko's case declined to comment.

The charge that psychiatry is again being abused is not universally accepted within the profession. "The problem of forced treatment or psychiatric persecution existed more than 20 years ago, but it was solved. And since then I haven't heard of any case of forced psychiatric examination or treatment," said Vladimir Rotstein, president of Public Initiative on Psychiatry, an advocacy group.

The Independent Psychiatric Association, however, says that the number of activists being wrongfully hospitalized in mental facilities totals dozens of cases in recent years and is increasing.

Doctors and the courts are complicit with investigators who insist on a forced psychiatric evaluation or treatment, it says. Activists have also documented an increase of family or business disputes in which wrongful hospitalization provides an opening to seize a person's property, Vinogradova said.

Most of the targeted activists are not affiliated with major human rights groups. Rather, like Trutko, they are stubborn gadflies who are involved in long-running feuds with local authorities. Their sometimes intemperate complaints against authorities are used to open criminal investigations for slander. This allows authorities to seek hospitalization. Unlike Soviet dissidents, these activists are put away for relatively short periods of a week to several months.
Roman Lukin, a businessman in the Volga River city of Cheboksary, was hospitalized last year for "unexplainable behavior" after he held up a sign on a public square calling three judges "creeps." Seeking redress for a bad debt that ruined him, Lukin felt he had not received justice from the courts. He spent two weeks in the local psychiatric hospital, which recommended that he undergo further examination at a specialized clinic in Moscow for possible "paranoid personality disorder." Independent Psychiatric Association specialists evaluated Lukin and found no sign of mental illness.

Nikolai Skachkov, who protested police brutality and official corruption in the Omsk region of Siberia, was ordered to undergo a psychiatric evaluation last year because investigators said they suspected he was suffering from "an acute sense of justice." He spent six months in a closed psychiatric facility where he was diagnosed as paranoid. The association, which conducted a separate evaluation earlier this year, found that he was healthy.

"Psychiatry in this country has always been a tool of the authorities, a tool for managing people and pressuring people. And it still is," said Boris Panteleyev, head of the St. Petersburg Committee for Human Rights.

In an interview in her apartment, Trutko recounted her own long run-in. "Now I have this stamp on my forehead that I am a psychiatric patient," she said. "I will always have this medical record now. That means I cannot go to court because judges say I'm a psycho and call for an ambulance."

Trutko is well known in the courts in this town, having argued dozens of court cases against the local authorities and police. She is studying to be a lawyer, and for several years has acted as a public defender, as advocates without law degrees are called here.

Her troubles with mental health authorities began four years ago in a courtroom in Dmitrov, about 35 miles from Dubna.

Trutko asserted that the judge displayed bias against her client in a property dispute, and she moved to have the judge withdrawn. She also complained that the judge was not wearing her robe as required and that the Russian flag was improperly displayed. The judge, who later left the bench and could not be reached for comment, alleged that Trutko said, "Look at that fat pig sitting up there," according to legal papers.

Prosecutors opened a criminal case against Trutko on charges of contempt of court. In July 2003, the court ordered Trutko to undergo an involuntary psychiatric evaluation. Psychiatrists at the hospital said she was uncooperative, illogical and displayed emotional reactions that were "not adequate" -- a common phrase here for mental illness.

The Independent Psychiatric Association questioned these conclusions. Its own evaluation of her, conducted by four psychiatrists, found that "she is not an ordinary personality, but a very gifted and creative person. . . . No psychiatric symptoms were observed. She shows high intellectual ability and good memory. She does not need any treatment."

Trutko continued to battle the criminal complaint in court. Before a hearing at the higher Moscow regional court, she filed a motion seeking the removal of a panel of judges from her case, again asserting bias. In this case there was no claim of verbal abuse, but prosecutors said her motion amounted to slander and contempt.

In April 2004, after leaving a hearing on her case in Moscow, Trutko was detained by investigators and taken to the Serbsky Institute. It was a Friday evening when she was admitted and there was no expert commission available to evaluate her, Trutko said. Human rights groups protested her detention and threatened legal action. Trutko said she was released the following Tuesday morning without having undergone any formal examination by psychiatrists.

But the institute issued a six-page evaluation that said she suffered from a "paranoid personality disorder." The condition manifested itself in her "subjectivity," her "tendencies to verbal aggression," her "suspicious" personality and her "inability to understand the peculiarities of interpersonal relations and communication," medical records show.

The report recommended that she undergo forced hospitalization and treatment.
In September 2004, a Moscow court approved that approach. But the authorities, for reasons that remain unclear, did not act on the order until they stormed Trutko's apartment earlier this year.

Despite her subsequent release, Trutko said, the court order remains in effect and she could be institutionalized again at any time. "My career is ruined," she said. "I just stay at home."