DOCTORS AT JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER IGNORE FACTS AND LAW TO DEFAME.

Brief statement of the issue:

-Doctors at Jersey City Medical Center have ridiculous excuses about why they can't learn the facts and law in my case, yet, they have no difficulty defaming me ( medical malpractice ).

-They claim that because 36 federal judges upheld a fabricated ruling that a
" former " student cannot correct her records, it must be true, you know, 'cause the judges said so ( like we just fell off a turnip truck ).


-These doctors do not honesty and sincerely believe that if their medical schools made a one-time, honest mistake in their records that they as " former " students would not be able to correct that mistake. These doctors know better.

Details:

-36 federal judges already admitted guilt to Congressman Mica's office, and told that office that if they were brought before the House Judiciary Committee they would blame their law clerks.

-Contrary to Judge Patterson's ruling, a " former " student CAN correct her records.

-Judge Patterson issued a fabricated ruling that I as a " former " student cannot correct records that were intentionally falsified by my medical school, the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, including financial/business records that make me a crime victim in a federal student loan program. The entire Second Circuit upheld this fabricated ruling.

-Einstein's published school policy states otherwise ( a breach of contract issue, not an educational malpractice issue ). There is no distinction in Einstein's published policies between a current student and a "former" student: "Student includes any individual with respect to whom an educational record is maintained".

-Einstein's official publications and statements are based on the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 34 CFR part 99 explicitly states: " Student...means any individual who is or has been in attendance at an educational agency or institution and regarding whom the agency or institution maintains educational records." Gee, does "has been" sound like "former" ? !

[note: The Code of Federal Regulations is an administrative code that allows government to function. The law on which it is based is the U.S. Code. One should always refer to the U.S. Code, as these statutes provide more protection.]

20 USCS sec. 1232g (a)(6), upon which the CFR is based states: "...student includes any person with respect to whom an educational agency or institution maintains educational records or personally identifiable information..." .

-Moreover, a student's records are property that belongs to the student, not the school, because it is the tuition that the student paid, and the public money that the student brought with her into the school that paid for those records to be created and maintained, just like a patient's records are property that belongs to the patient, not the doctor, because the patient paid the fees that caused those records to be created and maintained.

[note: I already gave briefing books to members of Congress.]

-My medical school refuses to correct my records, and continues to publish information that school officials know is inaccurate and damaging to me, in violation of law and accreditation standards, despite the fact that school officials know that they have a duty to maintain accurate and correct records of all students, including me.

Another example:

-Just a few weeks ago, I had conversations with James ( Jimmy ) David, M.D. Jimmy David is a significant figure in my illegal expulsion, a former dean for students at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and a psychiatrist specializing in thought disorders [ in case there is a question, I was never Jimmy David's patient ].

-Jimmy David and I discussed the ruling in my case that a " former " student could not correct her records. Not only did Dr. David recognize that this ruling was wrong, and he even mentioned Einstein's published policy based on federal law; of course, a " former " can correct her records.

Another example:

Congressman Joseph Crowley, in a meeting with me and other witnesses, laughed and said that the ruling that a " former " student could not correct her records was absurd ( he didn't have to know any law, Congressman Crowley exercised simple common sense ). He tried to help me and another student wronged by Yeshiva University. I have a letter from him, on his office's letterhead, asking a state agency to look into this matter.

Do the doctors at Jersey City Medical Center believe that I hallucinated this meeting? Maybe they think the other witnesses, Congressman Crowley, his staff, and other vistors to his office on this day are hallucinating too?

[ I will post more examples ASAP ].