Notes re: Judge Fast protected Asaf Rosenheim at my expense.

Brief statement of the issue:



-It is impossible to believe that I was continously out-of-touch with reality for years, when, at the same time I can provide creditable evidence ( some already posted on this blog ), as data-points along a time-line, that is wholly at odds with this characterization.



One (of many) detailed examples:



-I could not have been continously delusional for years at the same time that Mrs. Pagnozzi, my landlady, called me as a witness to defend herself in a Small Claims action brought against her by Asaf Rosenheim, described in published reports by his school, as an Israeli.





Details:



-Audio-tape of Small Claims action on 02-27-2004 in Asaf Fosenheim v. Magda Pagnozzi demonstrates that I was sworn-in , gave testimony, and authenicated into evidence a check for $500, dated June 2003, that I paid to Asaf Rosenheim when I moved-in, as his room-mate, to pay for my half of the security deposit.


-Mrs. Pagnozzi used my check and my sworn testimony to defend herself against Asaf Rosenheim when he tried to cheat her out of $500.



-I could not have been continously out-of-touch with reality for years at the same time that Mrs. Pagnozzi called me as her witness to achieve a ruling in her favor.



-I should have been allowed to enter the 02-27-2004 audio-tape into evidence in landlord-tenant court, in 2008, LT--03443-08, Hudson County, Superior Court, 595 Newark Ave, Jersey City, NJ, 7th floor.


-Judge Fast accepted into evidence my check dated June 2003, but, then, claimed that the audio-tape dated 02-27-2004 was too old to be accepted into evidence.


-Judge Fast's ruling makes no sense, because my June 2003 check, which he did allow into evidence, is older.


-Also, Mrs. Pagnozzi could not have achieved a favorable ruling unless I was sworn-in to authenicate my check into evidence.


-In 2004, Mrs. Pagnozzi used me as a witness against Rosenheim.


-In 2008, Mrs. Pagnozzi contradicted herself. She testified that Mr. Rosenheim paid me $500 when I moved-in as his rommate. This makes no sense.


-Mrs. Pagnozzi knows with absolute certainty that her statements in landlord-tenant court are not true, irrefutably demonstrating her bad-faith towards me.


-Why did Mrs. Pagnozzi make statements she knew were not true? To protect Asaf Rosenheim, and discredit me?


-Who put these lies into Mrs. Pagnozzi's mouth?


-Why did Judge Fast work so hard to keep evidence favorable to me off-the-record? To protect my landlords, to protect Kenneth Kim, a law clerk who lied in my case, to protect Asaf Rosenheim, described by his school in published reports as an Israeli?